the most dangerous game Essay -- essays research papers

Richard Connells "The Most Dangerous Game" is a very fire write up of a man retrace. This story made me think about the pietism of catching Humans are the cleverest creatures on earth, but does it bankrupt them a license to kill the former(a) animals and even human beings weakerthan themselves? I give below a short summary of the story to set the eyeshot and then I will explore the ethics involved in hunting as a sport."The Most Dangerous Game" presents the story of a hunting watch, GeneralZaroff, who finds hunting human beings as the most insecure andfascinating sport. He likes hunting humans because human beings, unlike the other animals, can reason better and so provide a richer kicking for the hunter. He does not think hunting human beings is an immoral betbecause he believes in the theory of might is right and that the strong rescue the right to kill the weak. However in the story General Zarofffails to hunt down Rainsford, who had the ill fortune to a ccidentallyslip overboard a yacht and swim to the shore, seek shelter in theGenerals chateau in the center of a jungle, and become General Zaroffs quarry for three days. Nevertheless, Rainsford, who believes it isimmoral to hunt human beings, was clever and desperate--he gaveGeneral Zaroff the slip in the manhunt and killed the General. So The hunter who craved to pit his wits against the victims wits for the Sake of excitement met his end. In my opinion Rainsford, who was also agreat hunter, learnt ...